From 095fb50a7b09b29660ab9803bda5a26219bbd1e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Blaise Thompson Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 12:00:41 -0600 Subject: 2018-11-14 12:00 --- manual/manual.aux | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'manual/manual.aux') diff --git a/manual/manual.aux b/manual/manual.aux index 8a742ab..d69128f 100644 --- a/manual/manual.aux +++ b/manual/manual.aux @@ -16,8 +16,11 @@ \gdef\HyperFirstAtBeginDocument#1{#1} \providecommand\HyField@AuxAddToFields[1]{} \providecommand\HyField@AuxAddToCoFields[2]{} -\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Overview \& Performance}{2}{section.1}} -\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Measured current versus set current. On this log-log plot, the entire set-point range of 10 $\mu $A to 9.99 mA can clearly be seen. For both outputs, agreement within measurement error is achieved from 0.30 mA to 9.99 mA. Unfortunately, both outputs become nonlinear at the lowest setpoints, systematically overshooting the desired current. For an unknown reason, the agreement is worse for the left-hand output. All readings were taken with a load of 100 $\Omega $. }}{3}{figure.1}} -\newlabel{fig:setpoint}{{1}{3}{Measured current versus set current. On this log-log plot, the entire set-point range of 10 $\mu $A to 9.99 mA can clearly be seen. For both outputs, agreement within measurement error is achieved from 0.30 mA to 9.99 mA. Unfortunately, both outputs become nonlinear at the lowest setpoints, systematically overshooting the desired current. For an unknown reason, the agreement is worse for the left-hand output. All readings were taken with a load of 100 $\Omega $}{figure.1}{}} -\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Troubleshooting \& Repair}{4}{section.2}} +\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Overview \& Performance}{1}{section.1}} +\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Measured current versus set current. On this log-log plot, the entire set-point range of 10 $\mu $A to 9.99 mA can clearly be seen. For both outputs, agreement within measurement error is achieved from 0.30 mA to 9.99 mA. Unfortunately, both outputs become nonlinear at the lowest setpoints, systematically overshooting the desired current. For an unknown reason, the agreement is worse for the left-hand output. All readings were taken with a load of 100 $\Omega $. }}{2}{figure.1}} +\newlabel{fig:setpoint}{{1}{2}{Measured current versus set current. On this log-log plot, the entire set-point range of 10 $\mu $A to 9.99 mA can clearly be seen. For both outputs, agreement within measurement error is achieved from 0.30 mA to 9.99 mA. Unfortunately, both outputs become nonlinear at the lowest setpoints, systematically overshooting the desired current. For an unknown reason, the agreement is worse for the left-hand output. All readings were taken with a load of 100 $\Omega $}{figure.1}{}} +\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Measured applied voltage versus load resistance. All readings were taken at a current set-point of 1 mA. The ``ideal'' ohms law behavior is represented by the grey diagonal line. Both outputs saturate at just above 13 V. }}{3}{figure.2}} +\newlabel{fig:load}{{2}{3}{Measured applied voltage versus load resistance. All readings were taken at a current set-point of 1 mA. The ``ideal'' ohms law behavior is represented by the grey diagonal line. Both outputs saturate at just above 13 V}{figure.2}{}} +\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Troubleshooting}{4}{section.2}} \@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Appendix}{5}{section.3}} +\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Parts}{6}{subsection.3.1}} -- cgit v1.2.3