From 46eb6bad8700abdfef52fd83445607228016b10b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Blaise Thompson <blaise@untzag.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 16:45:13 -0500
Subject: 2018-03-24 16:45

---
 active_correction/chapter.tex | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

(limited to 'active_correction/chapter.tex')

diff --git a/active_correction/chapter.tex b/active_correction/chapter.tex
index 6d429a0..fbbc26c 100644
--- a/active_correction/chapter.tex
+++ b/active_correction/chapter.tex
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ parameterization of delay space chosen.  %
 First I focus on the interference patterns in 2D delay space where all excitation fields and the
 detection field are at the same frequency.  %
 
-\begin{dfigure}
+\begin{figure}
 	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{"active_correction/scatter/scatter interference in TrEE old"}
 	\caption[Simulated interference paterns in old delay parameterization.]{Numerically simulated
     interference patterns between scatter and TrEE for the old delay parametrization. Each column
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ detection field are at the same frequency.  %
     bottom row shows the 2D Fourier transform, with the colorbar's dynamic range chosen to show the
     cross peaks.}
   label{fig:scatterinterferenceinTrEEold}
-\end{dfigure}
+\end{figure}
 
 Here I derive the slopes of constant phase for the old delay space, where
 $\mathrm{d1}=\tau_{2^\prime1}$ and $\mathrm{d2}=\tau_{21}$.  %
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ The cross term between scatter and signal is the product of $\Phi_\mathrm{sig}$
 Figure \ref{fig:scatterinterferenceinTrEEold} presents numerical simulations of scatter interference as a visual aid. See Yurs 2011 \cite{YursLenaA2011a}.
 % TODO: Yurs 2011 Data
 
-\begin{dfigure}
+\begin{figure}
 	\includegraphics[width=7in]{"active_correction/scatter/scatter interference in TrEE current"}
 	\caption[Simulated interference paterns in current delay parameterization.]{Numerically simulated
     interference patterns between scatter and TrEE for the current delay parametrization. Each
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ Figure \ref{fig:scatterinterferenceinTrEEold} presents numerical simulations of
     the bottom row shows the 2D Fourier transform, with the colorbar's dynamic range chosen to show
     the cross peaks.}
   \label{fig:scatterinterferenceinTrEEcurrent}
-\end{dfigure}
+\end{figure}
 
 Here I derive the slopes of constant phase for the current delay space, where $\mathrm{d1}=\tau_{22^\prime}$ and $\mathrm{d2}=\tau_{21}$. I take $\tau_2$ to be $0$, so that $\tau_{22^\prime}\rightarrow\tau_{2^\prime}$ and $\tau_{21}\rightarrow\tau_1$. The phase of the signal is then
 \begin{equation}
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ this technique was used prior to May 2016 in the Wright Group...  %
 `leveling' and single-chopping is also used in some early 2DES work...
 \cite{BrixnerTobias2004a}.  %
 
-\begin{dfigure} 
+\begin{figure} 
 	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{"active_correction/scatter/TA chopping comparison"}
 	\caption[Comparison of single, dual chopping.]{Comparison of single and dual chopping in a
     MoS\textsubscript{2} transient absorption experiment. Note that this data has not been
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ this technique was used prior to May 2016 in the Wright Group...  %
     grey line near 2 eV represents the pump energy. The inset labels are the number of laser shots
     taken and the chopping strategy used.}
   \label{fig:ta-chopping-comparison}
-\end{dfigure}
+\end{figure}
 
 Figure \ref{fig:ta-chopping-comparison} shows the effects of dual chopping for some representative
 MoS\textsubscript{2} TA data.  %
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

