From 1b66cf20d0f40741d89d39b901716341beeabeca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Blaise Thompson <blaise@untzag.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 21:05:20 -0500
Subject: structure

---
 instrument.tex | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'instrument.tex')

diff --git a/instrument.tex b/instrument.tex
index 564b757..6eee6e8 100644
--- a/instrument.tex
+++ b/instrument.tex
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ First I focus on the interference patterns in 2D delay space where all excitatio
 
 \begin{figure}[p!] \label{fig:scatterinterferenceinTrEEold}
 	\centering
-	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{"figures/instrument/scatter/scatter interference in TrEE old"}
+	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{"instrument/scatter/scatter interference in TrEE old"}
 	\caption[Simulated interference paterns in old delay parameterization.]{Numerically simulated interference patterns between scatter and TrEE for the old delay parametrization. Each column has scatter from a single excitation field. The top row shows the measured intensities, the bottom row shows the 2D Fourier transform, with the colorbar's dynamic range chosen to show the cross peaks.}
 \end{figure}
 Here I derive the slopes of constant phase for the old delay space, where $\mathrm{d1}=\tau_{2^\prime1}$ and $\mathrm{d2}=\tau_{21}$. For simplicity, I take $\tau_1$ to be $0$, so that $\tau_{21}\rightarrow\tau_2$ and $\tau_{2^\prime1}\rightarrow\tau_{2^\prime}$. The phase of signal is then
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ Figure \ref{fig:scatterinterferenceinTrEEold} presents numerical simulations of
 
 \begin{figure}[p!] \label{fig:scatterinterferenceinTrEEcurrent}
 	\centering
-	\includegraphics[width=7in]{"figures/instrument/scatter/scatter interference in TrEE current"}
+	\includegraphics[width=7in]{"instrument/scatter/scatter interference in TrEE current"}
 	\caption[Simulated interference paterns in current delay parameterization.]{Numerically simulated interference patterns between scatter and TrEE for the current delay parametrization. Each column has scatter from a single excitation field. The top row shows the measured intensities, the bottom row shows the 2D Fourier transform, with the colorbar's dynamic range chosen to show the cross peaks.}
 \end{figure}
 
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ An alternative to dual chopping is single-chopping and `leveling'... this techni
 
 \begin{figure}[p!] \label{fig:ta-chopping-comparison}
 	\centering
-	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{"figures/instrument/scatter/TA chopping comparison"}
+	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{"instrument/scatter/TA chopping comparison"}
 	\caption[Comparison of single, dual chopping.]{Comparison of single and dual chopping in a MoS\textsubscript{2} transient absorption experiment. Note that this data has not been processed in any way - the colorbar represents changes in intensity seen by the detector. The grey line near 2 eV represents the pump energy. The inset labels are the number of laser shots taken and the chopping strategy used.}
 \end{figure}
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

