From 4ec6538aec763b6cee0f79a0ebcd738aab5a3b41 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Blaise Thompson <blaise@untzag.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 18:37:19 -0600
Subject: MX2 content grab

---
 instrument/chapter.tex | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

(limited to 'instrument/chapter.tex')

diff --git a/instrument/chapter.tex b/instrument/chapter.tex
index 179a629..be8ed71 100644
--- a/instrument/chapter.tex
+++ b/instrument/chapter.tex
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ I_{\mathrm{detected}} = \overline{(E_1+E_2)}E_{2^\prime} + (E_1+E_2)\overline{E_
 \end{split}
 \end{equation}
 A similar expression in the case of heterodyne-detected 4WM is derived by
-\textcite{BrixnerTobias2004.000}.  %
+\textcite{BrixnerTobias2004a}.  %
 The goal of any `scatter rejection' processing procedure is to isolate $|E_{\mathrm{4WM}}|^2$ from
 the other terms.  %
 
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ The cross term between scatter and signal is the product of $\Phi_\mathrm{sig}$
 \Delta_{2} = \Phi_{\mathrm{sig}}\mathrm{e}^{-\tau_2\omega} &=&  \mathrm{e}^{-\left((\tau_{2^\prime}-2\tau_2)\omega\right)}\\
 \Delta_{2^\prime} = \Phi_{\mathrm{sig}}\mathrm{e}^{-\tau_{2^\prime}\omega} &=& \mathrm{e}^{-\tau_{2}\omega}
 \end{eqnarray}
-Figure \ref{fig:scatterinterferenceinTrEEold} presents numerical simulations of scatter interference as a visual aid. See Yurs 2011 \cite{YursLenaA2011.000}.
+Figure \ref{fig:scatterinterferenceinTrEEold} presents numerical simulations of scatter interference as a visual aid. See Yurs 2011 \cite{YursLenaA2011a}.
 % TODO: Yurs 2011 Data
 
 \begin{figure}[p!] \label{fig:scatterinterferenceinTrEEcurrent}
@@ -130,12 +130,12 @@ separated after light collection.  %
 	\caption[Shot-types in phase shifted parallel modulation.]{Four shot-types in a general phase shifted parallel modulation scheme. The `other' category represents anything that doesn't depend on either chopper, including scatter from other excitation sources, background light, detector voltage offsets, etc.}
 \end{table}
 
-We use the dual chopping scheme developed by \textcite{FurutaKoichi2012.000} called `phase shifted
+We use the dual chopping scheme developed by \textcite{FurutaKoichi2012a} called `phase shifted
 parallel modulation'.  %
 In this scheme, two excitation sources are chopped at 1/4 of the laser repetition rate (two pulses
 on, two pulses off).  %
-Very similar schemes are discussed by \textcite{AugulisRamunas2011.000} and
-\textcite{HeislerIsmael2014.000} for two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy.  %
+Very similar schemes are discussed by \textcite{AugulisRamunas2011a} and
+\textcite{HeislerIsmael2014a} for two-dimensional electronic spectroscopy.  %
 The two chop patterns are phase-shifted to make the four-pulse pattern represented in Table
 \ref{tab:phase_shifted_parallel_modulation}.  %
 In principle this chopping scheme can be achieved with a single judiciously placed mechanical
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ To remove such interference terms, you must \textit{fibrillate} your excitation
 An alternative to dual chopping is single-chopping and `leveling'...  %
 this technique was used prior to May 2016 in the Wright Group...  %
 `leveling' and single-chopping is also used in some early 2DES work...
-\cite{BrixnerTobias2004.000}.  %
+\cite{BrixnerTobias2004a}.  %
 
 \begin{figure}[p!] \label{fig:ta-chopping-comparison}
 	\centering
@@ -191,8 +191,8 @@ as the original single chopping.  %
 Fibrillation is the intentional randomization of excitation phase during an experiment.  %
 Because the interference term depends on the phase of the excitation field relative to the signal,
 averaging over many shots with random phase will cause the interference term to approach zero.  %
-This is a well known strategy for removing unwanted interference terms \cite{SpectorIvanC2015.000,
-  McClainBrianL2004.000}.  %
+This is a well known strategy for removing unwanted interference terms \cite{SpectorIvanC2015a,
+  McClainBrianL2004a}.  %
 
 \subsection{Normalization of dual-chopped self-heterodyned signal}
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

