From 676aee888e5dc94ba1cc05de869845f4c280c665 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Blaise Thompson <blaise@untzag.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 22:33:32 -0600
Subject: errata

---
 instrument/chapter.tex | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'instrument/chapter.tex')

diff --git a/instrument/chapter.tex b/instrument/chapter.tex
index ffb8eb5..179a629 100644
--- a/instrument/chapter.tex
+++ b/instrument/chapter.tex
@@ -196,6 +196,18 @@ This is a well known strategy for removing unwanted interference terms \cite{Spe
 
 \subsection{Normalization of dual-chopped self-heterodyned signal}
 
+%\begin{table}[!htb]
+%  \centering
+%  \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
+%\begin{array}{r | c | c | c | c }
+%  & A           & B & C & D \\ \hline
+%  \text{signal}   & S_A=V_A^S   & S_B=R^SC^1I_B^S & S_C=R^S(C^1) & S_D=R^SC^2I_D^S \\ \hline
+%  \text{source 1} & M_A^1=V_A^1 & M_B=R^1I_B^1    & M_C^1=R^1I_C^1 & M_D^1=V_D^1 \\ \hline
+%  \text{source 2} & M_A^2=V_A^2 & M_B^2=V_B^2     & M_C^2=R^2I_C^2 & M_D^2=R^2I_D^2
+%\end{array}
+%  \caption{CAPTION}
+%\end{table}
+
 Shot-by-shot normalization is not trivial for these experiments.  %
 As in table above, with 1 as pump and 2 as probe.  %
 
@@ -236,5 +248,3 @@ Now, substituting in BRAZARD formalism:
 \section{Optomechanics}  % ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 \subsection{Automated Neutral Density Wheels}
-
-
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

